The One Essay That's Left Just Got More Important
- betsygreaney
- Jul 31
- 3 min read
We wrote recently about the wave of colleges cutting their supplemental essays this cycle — Yale, Cornell, Georgia Tech, UNC, and more. That trend has a direct consequence worth sitting with: for a growing number of schools, the Common App personal statement isn't one piece of the picture anymore. It's most of it.
Fewer Essays, More Weight on the One That's Left
When a school drops its supplement, it doesn't stop trying to learn who a student is — it just has fewer places left to look. That means the personal statement absorbs work that used to be split across two or three pieces of writing: voice, values, judgment, the case for why this student is ready for what's next.
Admissions readers we've followed on this have said as much directly — the extra essay wasn't adding much distinct signal, which is part of why it got cut. But “not much extra signal” is different from “no signal.” What's left just has to carry more of it.
A personal statement that was already solid is still solid. A personal statement that was coasting on being one of three data points doesn't have that cushion anymore.
The One Essay Left Is Also the One AI Can't Write for a Student
This is where the essay-cutting trend and the AI conversation actually meet. Part of why schools trimmed the short, easy-to-generate “Why Us?” supplements is that they'd become easy to polish into something generic with a tool. The personal statement is harder to fake well — it has to hold up to length, specificity, and a voice that sounds like an actual seventeen-year-old and not a committee. That's exactly why it's the piece worth protecting, and coaching, rather than outsourcing.
We don't write essays. We ask the questions that pull a real story out of a student, then coach the drafting and revising — the voice on the page stays theirs, start to finish. That's not a new position for us. It just matters more this year than it did last year.
Where AI Genuinely Helps a Student — and Where It Backfires
Families ask us about this constantly, and the honest answer isn't “never touch it” or “use it for everything.” It depends on which part of the work the tool is doing.
Brainstorming and idea generation: genuinely useful. Asking a tool to help surface possible topics, angles, or memories worth exploring is closer to talking through ideas with a friend than it is to writing the essay. The student still has to recognize which idea is actually true and worth telling.
Organizing scattered thoughts: reasonable. Turning a messy voice memo or a page of bullet points into a rough shape a student can then rewrite in their own words is a starting point, not a finish line.
Drafting actual sentences: where it backfires. The moment a tool is generating the language that ends up in the essay, the voice stops being the student's — and readers who go through thousands of these every year are good at noticing writing that sounds like nobody in particular.
Polishing and “tightening up” prose: also risky, even though it feels harmless. Smoothing out a student's real sentences into cleaner, more generic ones is how a distinctive essay quietly turns into an average one.
Checking a school's honor code before using any tool at all: non-negotiable. A growing number of colleges now ask applicants to disclose or attest to how they used AI in their application; a few explicitly prohibit it in the personal statement. Confirm this per school — don't assume last year's policy still applies.
What This Looks Like in Practice
The distinction that actually matters isn't “AI or no AI.” It's who's doing the thinking versus who's doing the typing. A student can use a tool to brainstorm ten possible topics and still write every word of the essay themselves. A student can also type a single prompt and get something polished, generic, and not really theirs — and increasingly, that's the version admissions readers are getting better at spotting.
With one essay carrying more of the weight this cycle, the goal isn't to avoid every tool on principle. It's to make sure the sentences a reader sees are the ones only that student could have written.
If your student is heading into their personal statement and you want a second opinion on whether a draft still sounds like them, that's exactly the kind of question worth a conversation.
Comments